Showing posts with label bible study. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bible study. Show all posts

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Bible 4 Everyone

One of the great discplers God's placed in my life is Dorman Followwill. I think of him as my "Paul" and I am "Timothy."


By God's grace, he's worked with Global Media Outreach to put together 1-2 minute video summaries for each book of the Bible, plus introductions to the Old and New Testament.

Please do check them out by following this link: "Bible 4 Everyone", by Dorman Followill
I hope you're blessed by the Word.

The videos require Adobe Flash.

Wednesday, July 09, 2008

Galatians 2

Paul's defense of his apostleship and testimony continues in Galatians 2. Paul has been talking about the gospel that is from God and not from man and that he is a messenger from God, not from man, to present the gospel and that he is to please God, the sender of the message. So far Paul has not spelled it out how the gospel was being perverted in Galatia. In chapter 2, he gets down to it.

After fourteen years away from Jerusalem, Paul returns "because of a revelation" (2:2). It's not quite clear what this revelation was, but Paul earlier said that he received the gospel through a revelation of Jesus Christ. I would believe that the Spirit revealed to Paul that he should go to Jerusalem- a revelation of God not of man. This journey to Jerusalem is recorded in Acts 15.

So how was the gospel being perverted? In Acts 15:1-

1Some men came down from Judea and began teaching the brethren, "Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved."

Paul and Barnabas were in Antioch at the time and Jews ("from Judea") came down an preached a false gospel. They turned a gospel of grace into a gospel of legalism and works- you had to do a specific work in order to be saved.

Acts 15 and Galatians 2 records the same story- one from the Luke's historical perspective, and other from Paul's personal perspective. Paul says he submitted to those "of reputation" the gospel which he preached among the Gentiles, for he feared that he might be running in vain. Paul went to Jerusalem, directed by the Spirit, to submit the gospel he had been preaching to the elders at the Jerusalem church for approval or endorsement.

Note in 2:1, Paul makes a point to mention that Titus, a Greek (2:3), went with him to Jerusalem and that not even he was persuaded to be circumcised. Paul mentions Titus thirteen times in his epistles and was one of his closest brothers.

Remember that the early church came out of Judaism. God commanded the Israelites to circumcise baby boys as a sign of the the covenant made with Abraham. (Genesis 17:10-14) Now, some Jews who had become Christian were teaching that one had to be circumcised to be saved. The gospel was now going out to the Gentiles so this was a sensitive issue, to say the least. Note what Paul says about these "false brothers" in 2:4-

4But it was because of the false brethren secretly brought in, who had sneaked in to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, in order to bring us into bondage.

Note the terms "secretly," "sneaked in," and "spy." This was an intentional covert operation to cast lies in the gospel. Remember these were Jews from Judea who travelled up to Antioch! Antioch is about 300 miles north of Jerusalem. Perhaps the Jews did not want the Gentiles to enter into the Kingdom.

How do we handle people who teach lies? Do not yield; not even for an hour! 2:5-

5But we did not yield in subjection to them for even an hour, so that the truth of the gospel would remain with you.

In 2:7-10, we see that the Peter, James and John accepted Paul into their fellowship and saw that Paul had been redeemed by grace. In effect, Paul defends his apostleship by equating himself to Peter. Peter, an apostle, who brought the gospel to the Jews, the circumcised equated to Paul, an apostle, who brought the gospel to the Gentiles.

But even apostles sometimes err, and Paul calls out Peter(Cephas) here. Peter used to eat with the Gentiles, but when "certain men" sent by James came, he would distance himself from the Gentiles, "fearing the party of the circumcision." Paul calls out Peter for his hypocrisy. Jews were not to associate w/ Gentiles or they would be considered "unclean." (Acts 10:28) For Peter to eat with Gentiles, it was likely that he was eating non-kosher food. Yet, when those Jews were around he'd withdraw, probably avoiding eating with the Gentiles.

In Galatians 2:14-21 Paul quotes his rebuke of Peter. What is he saying here?

"If you, being a Jew, live like the Gentiles and not like the Jews, how is it that you compel the Gentiles to live like Jews?" (2:14)

14"If you, being a Jew, live like the Gentiles and not like the Jews, how is it that you compel the Gentiles to live like Jew?

Paul points out Peter's hypocrisy.

15"We are Jews by nature and not sinners from among the Gentiles

i.e. Jews follow the Law, whereas Gentiles (sinners) do not, but...

16nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, so that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified.

Paul is saying, "Even though we are Jews and followed the Law(v15), we know that man is not justified by following the Law, rather man is justified by faith in Christ."

Paul actually repeats himself here to get the point across. Three times in the same verse he says that man is not justified by the works of the Law (highlighted in red) and three times he says that justification comes through faith in Christ (highlighted in green).

17"But if, while seeking to be justified in Christ, we ourselves have also been found sinners, is Christ then a minister of sin? May it never be!

Even though we are justified by faith in Christ (building upon v16), we still sin, but that doesn't make Christ a "minister of sin."

18"For if I rebuild what I have once destroyed, I prove myself to be a transgressor.

The works of the Law by the flesh is what has been destroyed and we should not go back to them (rebuild). If we do, then we are proved transgressors.

19"For through the Law I died to the Law, so that I might live to God.

We are dead in our sins in the Law. "So that"- We had to die in our sins to the Law so that we could be alive in Christ (because there is no life in the Law.)

20"I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself up for me.

We identify with Christ in his death on the cross, for He died for our sins. It is we who should be on that cross, yet He took our place. As Christ died on the cross, so did our life by the Law. In Christ's resurrection, we now live by faith because He rose from the dead and He now lives in us, the believer.

21"I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died needlessly."

Living by the Law nullifies the grace of God; meaning- if we life by the Law, then God's grace is worthless to us because we have rejected grace for works. If we reject salvation, the Christ died needlessly. Suppose you bought a gift for your friend. But when you present the gift freely to your friend, he refuses it and insists on paying for the item himself. Paying for it himself requires his own money from his paycheck from his job. Now suppose this gift can not be purchased for one's self, but only purchased to be given away. This is what Christ did for us. Salvation is offered to us by grace. There's nothing we can do to earn it. Trying to attain salvation by works, in the case of the Jews this meant adhering to the Law, is futile. In Paul's time, the Jews tried to impose circumcision on the Gentiles. "Believe in Christ and be circumcised, then you are saved." Today, this legalism can be seen wherever we add things to the gospel- how many times have you done your daily devotions this past week? how much have you given in offering? are you "doing your part" at church? Notice that legalism usually amounts to something that is measurable.

Paul says we are dead to all that, for salvation in Christ is by grace. No more works by the flesh (spiritual dead), rather the life we live in the flesh (physical bodies) is by faith in Christ. Unfortunately, I can't say it any more eloquently that Paul said it himself in Galatians 2:20-

"I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself up for me.

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

1 Timothy 4

Chapter 3 concluded with Paul's purpose for writing to Timothy and a six line presentation of the life of Jesus Christ-

14I am writing these things to you, hoping to come to you before long;

15but in case I am delayed, I write so that you will know how one ought to conduct himself in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and support of the truth.

16By common confession, great is the mystery of godliness:
He who was revealed in the flesh,
Was vindicated in the Spirit,
Seen by angels,
Proclaimed among the nations,
Believed on in the world,
Taken up in glory.

It is key that Paul writes about the church being the pillar and support of the truth, for he continues to write in Chapter 4 about those who "fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons." Essentially, people will fall away by following false teachings.

Where are these false teachings coming from? v1-3 is a little hard to parse out in the NASB due to the long sentence. I will try to diagram it here:

1But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith,

paying attention

to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons,

2by means of the hypocrisy of liars seared in their own conscience as with a branding iron,

3men who forbid marriage and

advocate abstaining from foods

which God has created to be gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth.

People will fall away from the faith because they are following false teaching from "deceitful spirits" and "demons." This sounds otherworldly where we may be thinking that this would never happen to us or in our church, or in a modern day church. People following the teachings of evil spirits and demons? Yet, in the very same breath, Paul puts these men teaching false doctrine and alongside the spirits and demons. Apparently some men were forbidding marriage, which is very odd since God instituted marriage in the very beginning with Adam and Eve!

The false teaching of abstaining from certain foods was a key issue in the early church. The Law had strict guidelines as to what the Israelites were allowed to eat and what not to eat. We see this today in our supermarkets where foods are labeled as kosher. In Acts we see the Gospel going out to the Gentiles and in Acts 9 and 10, God leads Peter through a series of incidences where He shows him the Gospel is now going out to the Gentiles. The most famous incident is in Acts 10:9-19 where Peter falls into a trance and sees a sheet filled with unclean animals descending from the sky. Unclean meaning non-kosher. The Lord commands Peter to kill and eat, but Peter resists, saying that he's never eaten anything unclean. But the Lord says, "What God has cleansed, no longer consider unholy." (Acts 10:15) Also see Galatians 2 where Paul mentions this in another context.

While these men weren't teaching something radical such as worshipping Satan, but the false teaching was a teaching of legalism. I won't get into it here, but Paul chastises the Galatians for turning away from a life of grace and liberty in Christ and returning to a life of bondage in the Law from which Christ set us free. This legalistic false teaching can very easily seep into our lives in the way we think and live out or Christian faith.

One thing to note about the false teaching is that it takes what is intended to be good into something a sin. In v3, Paul writes that food and marriage was created by God to be "gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth." Note the end of the verse- "by those who believe and know the truth." This is in direct contrast to the false teachers! Those who believe and know the truth get to enjoy marriage and food while those who believe in the lies are deprived of that enjoyment.

Paul here shows Timothy the strategy to address false teaching which is to point it back to God, the source of truth!

Continuing on, Paul tells Timothy that if he points out these things (the truth vs. the lies), then he "will be a good servant of Christ Jesus." And a good servant of Christ Jesus is "constantly nourished on the words of the faith and of the sound doctrine which you have been following." Timothy, as pastor of the Ephesian church, was to be a man of the Word and sound doctrine, teaching it to his flock.

Additionally, Timothy was to "discipline" himself "for the purpose of godliness... since it holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come." Paul emphasizes the importance of this statement by saying "It is a trustworthy statement deserving full acceptance." (v9)

v10 Paul again presents the gospel in short form- "For it is for this we labor and strive, because we have fixed out hope on the living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of believers."

1 Timothy 4:6-10 are crucial to having a Biblical understanding the life of a pastor and his and the churches goal. According to the Apostle Paul, a pastor is to be a man of God's Word, continually nourising himself on it. (4:6) He is not to have anything to do with "worldy fables" (4:7) The pastor himself is to "discipline" himself "for the purpose of godliness" because godliness holds promise for this life and for the life in heaven. (4:8) And why is the pastor to do all this? For he is to be an example to the believers.

Without 4:10, the preceding verses are just "a good thing" to do. In 4:8 and 10, Paul gives the whole reason for ministry! 4:10-

For it is for this we labor and strive, because we have fixed our hope on the living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of believers.

Yes, this is the gospel in short form as I mentioned earlier. But here, Paul is giving one of the main reasons for the church ministry- to discipline(train) believers for the purpose of godliness because it "holds promise" in this life and in the afterlife in heaven. Why? v10, because of our hope in God who saved us.

Paul is coming back to what he started with in Chapter 1. Recall 1 Timothy 1:5-

But the goal of our instruction is love from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith

He continues to urge Timothy through the rest of Chapter 4-

11Prescribe and teach these things.

12Let no one look down on your youthfulness, but rather in speech, conduct, love, faith and purity, show yourself an example of those who believe.

13Until I come, give attention to the public reading of Scripture, to exhortation and teaching.

14Do not neglect the spiritual gift within you, which was bestowed on you through prophetic utterance with the laying on of hands by the presbytery.

15Take pains with these things; be absorbed in them, so that your progress will be evident to all.

16Pay close attention to yourself and to your teaching; persevere in these things, for as you do this you will ensure salvation both for yourself and for those who hear you.

Paul focuses on what Timothy what must do - "Prescribe and teach these things." Timothy is to keep on prescribing and teaching the truth. Note Paul uses two words here "prescribe" and "teach." Another word for prescribe is command. The Greek word here is "paragello"-

Paraggello:

  1. to transmit a message along from one to another, to declare, announce
  2. to command, order, charge

In effect, Timothy was to prescribe the Word that people would "take the prescription" so to speak. Just as a doctor writing a prescription for the patient, the presumption is that the patient will take the medicine and take it according to the instructions. So Timothy was just not to teach the Word and people could take it or leave it, but he was to charge them with the Word.

In all Timothy did, he was to show himself an example to those who believe- in speech, conduct, love, faith and purity. (4:12)

He was to "give attention to"- (4:13)

  • the public reading of Scripture
  • to exhortation: "paraklesis"
  • teaching

Going on, Paul instructs Timothy to not neglect the spiritual gift in him.

4:15 is very interesting- "Take pains with these things, be absorbed in them, so that your progress will be evident to all." These things Paul is instructing Timothy to do are not going to be easy things to do (take pains), yet he is to "be in them" (absorbed in them) to, again, be an example for others.

Finally 4:16, "Pay close attention to yourself and to your teaching; persevere in these things, for as you do this you will ensure salvation both for yourself and for those who hear you." Paul was warning against false teaching entering the church and causing believers to fall from the faith. After quickly showing Timothy how to fight lies with the truth from God, he instructs Timothy primarily in what he is to do as a pastor: Teach the Word and be focused on God's Word for himself for the purpose of godliness. Further Timothy, by being immersed in the Word, teaching the Word, nurturing his spiritual gift, being a godly man by example in speech, conduct, love, faith and purity will be an example to his flock and then will ensure the salvation both for himself and for those who hear him(v16).

Paul repeatedly urges Timothy to teach the Word:

v6 "In pointing out these things..."

v11 "Prescribe and teach these things...."

v13 "public reading of Scripture... teaching."

v16 "pay close attention ... to your teaching"

Paul also says twice that Timothy, the pastor, is an example to others...

v12 "show yourself and example..."

v15 "... so that your progress will be evident to all"

Paul's direct instruction to Timothy here is not telling Timothy how he should execute the ministry; i.e. "do this, do that, don't do this, don't do that." Rather Paul's focus is on Timothy, the pastor. The pastor need do only a few things. First is to continually teach the Word to the believers. Second is to be example to the believers of the Word which is alive and at work in him. This is how the gospel message is secured in each persons heart and will not be seduced by false teachings. Lastly note in v16 at the end, that in doing so, Timothy will ensure salvation "for those who hear you." Remember in v1, Paul said the Spirit revealed that in "later times some will fall away from the faith." In v16, Paul has just concluded instructing Timothy in the priorities of a pastor but how to keep people from falling away from the faith.


Monday, June 30, 2008

1 Timothy 3

In 1 Timothy 3, Paul follows on his teaching prayer and the order of men and women in the church with the order of the church itself in the qualifications of overseers (elders) and deacons.

Paul opens the passage in a very interesting way, "It is a trustworthy statement." Paul uses this clause four times in the New Testament, all in the two letters to Timothy:

1 Timothy 1:15 - It is a trustworthy statement, deserving full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, among whom I am foremost of all.

1 Timothy 3:1 - It is a trustworthy statement: if any man aspires to the office of overseer, it is a fine work he desires to do.

1 Timothy 4:8-10 - For bodily discipline is only of little profit, but godliness is profitable for all things, since it holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come. 9It is a trustworthy statement deserving full acceptance. 10For it is for this we labor and strive, because we have fixed our hope on the living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of believers.

2 Timothy 2:11-12 - It is a trustworthy statement:

For if we died with Him, we will also live with Him;
12If we endure, we will also reign with Him;
If we deny Him, He also will deny us;

In three instances, Paul is is talking about salvation, value of godliness, and life in Christ. But in the instance here, Paul is talking about the leadership of the church. As sure as our salvation is, the office of overseer in the church is a fine work. It may not seem like much, but put alongside the other statements where Paul uses the phrase "a trustworthy statement" that is staggering.

Further, we can infer that it is a good thing for a man to want to be an overseer for fine work is done in that office.

Perhaps it is inherent in our culture or we are too humble if that were possible, but it seems many are afraid to aspire to the office of overseer because of the high qualifications that are listed by Paul in v2-7:

  • above reproach
  • husband of one wife
  • temperate
  • prudent
  • respectable
  • hospitable
  • able to teach
  • not addicted to wine
  • not pugnacious
  • gentle
  • peacable
  • free from the love of money
  • manages his own household well
  • keeping his children under control with all dignity
  • not a new convert
  • good reputation with those outside the church
Whew!

I'm not going to get into each and every one of these, but will note a few.
Note that Paul says "able to teach" in v2, but he doesn't say " spiritually gifted in teaching." Nor does he say "preach"- Paul just says "teach," which includes things such as teaching Bible Studies, Sunday School, seminars and, of course, preaching. Hence, elders aren't required to be able to preach, but need to be able to teach.

Verse 4 says, "He must be one who manages his own household well, keeping his children under control with all dignity." The NET Bible translates the end of verse 4 as, "keep his children in control without losing his dignity." So the elder must keep his children under control with all dignity. How many times have we seen parents in public completely lose their dignity while trying to keep their children under control?

I want to spend more time on Verses 6 and 7 which I think are very, very key to being an elder-

6and not a new convert, so that he will not become conceited and fall into the condemnation incurred by the devil.

7And he must have a good reputation with those outside the church, so that he will not fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.

Paul says that an elder should not be a new convert, which seems reasonable enough, but the exact reason he gives is very telling of what the heart of an elder should be. The elder shouldn't become conceited (Webster defn: having or showing an excessively high opinion of oneself) or he will fall into the same condemnation as the devil.

Ezekiel 28:11-19, God speaks of Satan, referring to him as the king of Tyre. A beautiful angel who turned to violence and sin and was proud and corrupted his wisdom because of his beauty. Satan was cast down from the mountain of God and was consumed with fire. This is the condemnation uncurred by the devil. Also see, Isaiah 14:12-15 and Revelation 12, 20.

In 1 Timothy 3:7, Paul mentions the snare of the devil. Paul refers to snare of the devil also in 2 Timothy 2-

24The Lord's bond-servant must not be quarrelsome, but be kind to all, able to teach, patient when wronged,

25with gentleness correcting those who are in opposition, if perhaps God may grant them repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth,

26and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, having been held captive by him to do his will.


In both passages, Paul is warning against falling into the snare of the devil and both passages relate to those outside the church. In 1 Timothy 3:7, he says that elders must have a good reputation with those outside the church. In 2 Timothy 2, Paul's telling Timothy how to relate to those outside the church, "those who are in opposition." The snare of the devil isn't referring to what happened to the devil, rather the devil's trap is to ruin our reputation and relationship with those outside the church, thereby ruining our witness for Christ.

I will not spend time on 1 Timothy 3:8-13, but I did note a few things to think about-
  1. Paul doesn't mention that Deacons need to be able to teach.
  2. These men must first be tested to be beyond reproach (v10), but not mentioned for elders. Look at how beyond/above reproach is used differently regarding elders and deacons.
  3. What is the meaning of v13? Why doesn't Paul say this about elders?

Finally, Paul tells Timothy why he's writing all this. In v15, "so that you will know how one ought to conduct himself in the household of God." A key word here is "ought." In the Webster's there are a range of meanings for "ought"-

—used to express obligation <ought to pay our debts>, advisability <ought to take care of yourself>, natural expectation <ought to be here by now>, or logical consequence ought to be infinity>

In Greek, this is the word "dei" meaning "it is binding" or "it must." Hence this is much stronger than "advisable." This was Paul's definite expectation of how one would behave at church and "one" is referring to the elders and deacons of the church. Also, note that Paul doesn't say "If you have elders and/or deacons, then..." No. For Paul it was a foregone conclusion that the church would be lead by elders and deacons. In Titus, Paul's first task for Titus is to appoint elders not just in a church, but in every city (where a church was planted).

Paul the evangelist closes the chapter talking about the church- "the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and support of the truth" It is key that Paul refers to the church as the pillar and support of truth for in Chapter 4, Paul instructs Timothy guard against false teaching and teach the truth. In classic Paul fashion, all he's written culminates in Christ in the last verse-

By common confession, great is the mystery of godliness:
He who was revealed in the flesh,
Was vindicated in the Spirit,
Seen by angels,
Proclaimed among the nations,
Believed on in the world,
Taken up in glory.

The life of Christ in 6 lines! Remember Paul launches into the gospel at the end of chapter 1, and again at the beginning of chapter 2! He does it again here in chapter 3!

Monday, June 23, 2008

1 Timothy 2

In Chapter 1, Paul gave Timothy his charge as the pastor of the church at Ephesus: To produce love from a pure heart, good conscience and sincere faith. Chapter 1 is foundational- it states the goal of our ministry. In fact, this is one very simple way we could evaluate our ministries- are the believers in our flock becoming more and more loving people because their heart is pure, their consciences are good and their faith is sincere?

2:1 "First of all" - What is the 1st thing Paul talks about after the foundation of Chapter 1? PRAYER!

1First of all, then, I urge that entreaties and prayers, petitions and thanksgivings, be made on behalf of all men,

2for kings and all who are in authority, so that we may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and dignity.

Paul gives four different names to prayer:
  1. Entreaties: An entreaty is an earnest or urgent request. (supplication)
  2. Prayers: Communicating with a deity
  3. Petitions: Formal message submitted to an authority
  4. Thanksgivings
And in these modes of prayer, we are to pray "on behalf of all men" (v1) and "for kings and all who are in authority" (v2). In v2, we can infer that the early Christians were persecuted and Paul's instruction is to ask the Lord that the authorities would not persecute them. If Paul stopped here, we could conclude that he's the purpose of the prayers are so that Christian can have an easy life- "tranquil and quite" - to live out our faith.

Yes! God sees this as "good and acceptable"- but the purpose is not for our own comfort and easy living. Rather it is to the heart of God, "who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth." It always keeps on coming back to God's redemptive plan- that none should be lost. So when our prayers is the beginning of our ministry; the beginning of our part in God' redemptive work.

How are we to pray for "all men" and "authorities?" We pray earnestly, making urgent requests. Do you have a loved one, or friend, or co-worker, or acquaintance that for whom you are praying for their salvation? Is it not easy to lose that sense of urgency? It is not uncommon to be praying for years before we see God changing one's heart to accept Jesus as Savior. So we should continue praying earnestly and urgently to the Lord.

We are to remember we are praying to God- who is all powerful, all knowing, all loving, infinitely wise, full of grace and mercy. Reading the O.T., we see that the Israelites had a complete reverence for God when they were faithful to Him. Consider that no unclean person could enter God's presence without facing certain death! Through Christ, we may approach the Father in prayer directly, but let us now lose our reverence for Him when we pray. We are in fact communicating with the supreme being of the universe!

We are to pray formally- petitions. Similar to having reverence, we are to pray formally. Or to formally pray. Sometimes, I rationalize that our all knowing God already knows my prayer before I even pray, so I merely need to think the request and that's a prayer to him. You may laugh, but perhaps you too have rationalizations for a weak prayer life! It is good to pray without ceasing (1 Thessalonians 5:17), yet we sometimes take that to mean that we do not have to stop everything and spend time with the Father in prayer and Jesus did.

Finally, we are to give thanks in our prayers!

If we go back and read v3, 4, continuing on through v5-6:

3This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior,
4who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.
5For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,
6who gave Himself as a ransom for all, the testimony given at the proper time.

Verses 5-6 are a direct follow on from verses 3-4. God desires all me to be saved (v4)- for(v5) or "because"- and Paul again launches into the gospel message for the 2nd time in the first two chapters! There is one God and Christ is the one mediator between God and us and it is Christ who paid for our sins.

Verse 7, Paul re-emphasizes his own calling as a preacher and an apostle. Like in 1:1, Paul reiterates his being an apostle. Remember that some in the early church doubted Paul's apostleship. Finally, Paul is appointed as the teacher to the Gentiles "in faith and truth." A Jew appointed to be the teacher of the Gentiles, writing to a Gentile pastor, at a Gentile church in a predominantly Gentile city!

Verse 8- "Therefore"- here's the bottom line:

8Therefore I want the men in every place to pray, ifting up holy hands, without wrath and dissension.

Note that Paul says that he wants all the men in every place to pray. Not just the leader, or the mature Christians, but every man!

Lifting up holy hands, without wrath and dissension. This is a hard one to live up to. Notably, prayer meetings are usually not well attended. And in fact, prayer seems to often times get brushed to the side because there are so many things to take care of at church.

In summary of 1 Timothy 2:1-8, the first thing we must do in ministry, before anything else, is to pray. Our prayers are to be earnest and urgent, formal and in reverence to our God, and full of thanksgiving. Prayer is the first step of our evangelical disciple-making mission- whoever and wherever we are. But here, Paul instructs all men everywhere to pray in holiness and peace and unity with each other! Men, step up, kneel, and pray!

2:9 begins "Likewise, I want women..." So we see that the 1st part of this 1st step of ministry focused on the call for men to pray. Continuing on, still in the context of prayer, Paul instructs the women.
In verse 9, Paul instructs them to dress properly and modestly and discreetly. Rather, he encourages women to adorn themselves "by means of good works as is proper for women making a claim to godliness." Perhaps one's initial reaction is that Paul is a sexist! He's playing up the stereotype of women being concerned with vanity, some may say. Yet, we do see this being played out in modern societies where fashion and cosmetic vanity products are overwhelmingly targeted towards women. So the women today are not unlike the women of Paul's time, or the women at the Ephesian church.

Now, in 1 Timothy 2:11-15,

11A woman must quietly receive instruction with entire submissiveness.
12But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet.
13For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve.
14And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression.
15But women will be preserved through the bearing of children if they continue in faith and love and sanctity with self-restraint.

I believe that Paul's whole point of this controversial passage is that of headship. The keyword here is "for" in v13, just as it was in v5. Why is Paul saying this? The question here is not primarily of women teaching, but of headship. Who is the head of the marriage? head of the house? head of the church? head of the man? head of Christ?

Paul cites the creation order- Adam was created first, and Eve to be a helper. In 1 Corinthians 11, Paul writes about the same topic:

1Be imitators of me, just as I also am of Christ.
2Now I praise you because you remember me in everything and hold firmly to the traditions, just as I delivered them to you.
3
But I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ.
4Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head.
5But every woman who has her head uncovered while praying or prophesying disgraces her head, for she is one and the same as the woman whose head is shaved.
6For if a woman does not cover her head, let her also have her hair cut off; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, let her cover her head. 7For a man ought not to have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man.
8For man does not originate from woman, but woman from man;
9for indeed man was not created for the woman's sake, but woman for the man's sake. 10Therefore the woman ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels.

Here, we clearly see the issue of headship. In 1 Corinthians 11:3- Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ. Now, in 1 Corinthians 11:5, Paul presumes that women would be teaching(prophesying), but the woman having her head covered recognizes that the man is her "head." Prophesying is

Back in 1 Timothy 2:14, Paul points out that it was not Adam that was deceived, but the woman, Eve. Note that Paul is not putting Eve down because she was deceived! In Genesis 3:13, Eve herself said, "The serpent deceived me, and I ate." I ate is equivalent to, "I sinned." Paul said, "fell into transgression."

But Paul points out the "salvation" (presevered/saved) of women in v15 "through the bearing of children if they continue in faith and love and sanctity with self-restraint." The latter part of this verse must sound so familiar, for in Chapter 1 Paul charged Timothy that the goal of their teaching was love from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith.
Here, Paul says virtually the same thing! Women are to continue growing in love, as instructed in Chapter 1, and raise their children likewise. The bottom line here is that Paul is instructing women to disciple their children with the same goal as Timothy- love.

In Chapter 3, Paul lays out the structure and qualifications of leadership of the church. In Chapter 2, he points out the most important thing. "First things first," so to speak, and that is prayer. Further, Paul is clearly defines the order of men and women in the church for he will next teach about the leaders of the church.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Psalm 1:2

A = But his delight is
B = in the law of the LORD, and
B' = on his law
A' = he meditates day and night.

Poetic symmetry :)

We meditate day and night on the thing(s) in which we find delight. I want this verse to be true of my life that I delight in "the law," God's Word, and meditate on it day and night.

Monday, June 16, 2008

1 Timothy 1

Before we look dive into 1 Timothy, let's look at the context of this pastoral epistle by Paul-

Acts 20:17-38-

Paul went to Ephesus and found some disciples there. He taught in the synagogue, but when some of the people developed hard hearts Paul took the disciples and formed the Ephesian church where he remained for two years. Paul proceeded to Macedonia and Greece, then returned to Miletus, about 30 miles south of Ephesus, on his way to Jerusalem. Paul thought that this was the final time he would be with the Ephesian elders, meeting Miletus.

Paul's final instructions to the elders in Ephesus:
v28 Be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood.

29"I know that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock;

30and from among your own selves men will arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after them.

31"Therefore be on the alert, remembering that night and day for a period of three years I did not cease to admonish each one with tears.


v35 "In everything I showed you that by working hard in this manner you must help the weak and remember the words of the Lord Jesus, that He Himself said, 'It is more blessed to give than to receive.'"


After Paul's release from prison in Rome, he ended up returning to Ephesus and Timothy joined him there later. Paul then instructs Timothy to stay in Ephesus to continue as the pastor there.

Here we go!

v1:1 Paul, an apostle
of Christ Jesus
according to the commandment of God our Savior and
of Christ Jesus,
who is our hope

What is an apostle? "men who were commissioned by the Lord Himself and given the task of speaking authoritatively on doctrine and practice in the church."

Though 1 Timothy was a personal letter to Paul's "true child in the faith" (v1:2), Paul knew that his letters would be distributed among the churches. Therefore he identifies the his authority from Christ Himself, for one issue in the 1st century church was a debate of whether to consider Paul an apostle since he was not among the original 12 disciples.

Therefore, we are to likewise heed Paul's instructions as authoritative and from God. Paul identifies Timothy as his "true child in the faith." Perhaps this was also a "vote of confidence" or "stamp of approval" for Timothy in the Ephesian church as he was young (v4:12).


v1:3 Timothy's purpose in Ephesus:
so that you may
instruct certain men not to teach strange doctrines,
4nor to pay attention to myths and endless genealogies
which give rise to mere speculation
rather than furthering the administration of God which is by faith. (NIV: God's work)

v1:5 The goal of Paul and Timothy's instruction is love from:
  1. pure heart
  2. good conscience
  3. sincere faith

Some people wanted to be teachers of the Law, even though they didn't understand what they were saying! (v1:7) Implied that they were not using the Law lawfully. (v1:8) Law is for the anything that is contrary to sound teaching (v9, 10) according to the gospel, with which Paul's been entrusted. (v11).

Note also that Paul and Timothy's instruction is not just for the sake of correcting heresy, but it is to be out of love and to produce love!

Paul has been entrusted with the gospel, hence he is instructing Timothy to teach men not to teach strange doctrines.

Paul continues in the v12-17 to explain how he was entrusted with the gospel:
v12 Begins w/ thanksgiving to Christ Jesus our Lord who strengthened me, because He considered him faithful, hence put him into service.
God strengthens those who are faithful and will put them into service.

v13 "even though I was formerly"-
  • a blasphemer
  • persecutor
  • violent aggressor
Yet shown mercy because I acted ignorantly in unbelief.

v14 "and the grace of our Lord was more than abundant, with the faith and love which are found in Christ Jesus."

Paul did things in ignorance (unbelief) but was granted mercy- he didn't receive the punishment that he deserved. Rather he received grace, faith and love from God.

v15 It is a trustworthy statement, deserving full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, among whom I am foremost of all.
Interestingly, Paul is writing Timothy to teach men not to teach unsound doctrine and in this first chapter, sound teaching is found right here in v15- a trustworthy statement, deserving full acceptance- that Jesus came into the world to save sinners! We just gotta stick to the truth!

Paul also identifies himself as the preeminent sinner in v15. But because he is the worst of all sinners, Christ demonstrated "perfect patience" to grant Paul mercy. When Paul was known as Saul, the Pharisee persecuting the Christians, I bet many Christians may have thought, "Why does God not act?" Have you ever heard that question posed? It's usually on the topic of pain and suffering. Why doesn't God step in and stop killers, rapists, etc.? Here Paul gives the reason he was granted mercy- because of Christ's "perfect patience."

What is perfect patience? It may be hard to accept and understand sometimes, but God had a purpose in allowing the Christians to be killed by Saul. Now "Paul," he says that it was so that it may be example for "those who would believe in Him for eternal life." Seeing the persecution of the church by Saul, God could have stopped him in a myriad of ways. But God was patient and merciful and called Saul, "Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?"

Acts 1:5-And he(Saul)said, "Who are You, Lord?" And He said, "I am Jesus whom you are persecuting, 6but get up and enter the city, and it will be told you what you must do."

"But" expresses God's mercy on Saul. Mercy in that God could have taken Saul down right then and there.
"And" expresses God's grace on Saul. Grace in that God gave Saul an opportunity to turn around from being the foremost of sinners to an apostle of Christ!

Back to 1 Timothy 1:16, Paul is saying that if he, the worst of the worst of sinners can be reformed by God, then no one is ever totally lost in this life. God has given each of us a time here on Earth to call him Savior and Lord, when that time is up and we've not put our full faith in Him, then we are totally lost to damnation.

Fittingly, Paul breaks into praise, v1:17- 17Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen.

The chapter ends with Paul's commission again to Timothy-

18This command I entrust to you, Timothy, my son, in accordance with the prophecies previously made concerning you, that by them you fight the good fight,

19keeping faith and a good conscience, which some have rejected and suffered shipwreck in regard to their faith.

20Among these are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan, so that they will be taught not to blaspheme.


v18-19, Paul commissions Timothy again fight the good fight = keeping faith and good conscience
Very similar to v5, love from:
  1. pure heart
    • no ulterior motives or agenda
  2. good conscience
    • doing what you know you should
  3. sincere faith
    • not a hypocrite
In this first chapter, Paul instructed Timothy what to do and how to do it.
What: He was to each men not to teach unsound doctrine. In other words, Timothy was to teach men how to teach sound doctrine, hence preventing them from teaching strange doctrines.
How: Out of love- with a pure heart, clean conscience, and a sincere faith.

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Galatians 1

Paul opens the letter to the Galatians by identifying himself to be an apostle, "not sent from men nor through the agency of man, but through Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised Him from the dead." (1:1)

What is an apostle? "men who were commissioned by the Lord Himself and given the task of speaking authoritatively on doctrine and practice in the church." Therefore he establishes that his authority is from Christ Himself, for one issue in the 1st century church was a debate of whether to consider Paul an apostle since he was not among the original 12 disciples. We are to heed Paul's instructions as authoritative and from God.

Paul intended this letter to be distributed "to the churches (plural) of Galatia." (1:2)

Verse 1:3, sounds like a standard salutation:

3Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ,

4who gave Himself for our sins so that He might rescue us from this present evil age, according to the will of (J)our God and Father,

5to whom be the glory forevermore. Amen.


Paul immediately launches into the gospel and reduces it down to just two verses- 1:4, 5

After the greeting, Paul launches directly into the central issue with the Galatians, they are "so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel." (1:6) "A different gospel" is an oxymoron as Paul explains in 1:7 that it is "really not another; only there are some who are disturbing you and what to distort the gospel of Christ."

There is a sad irony in these first few verses of Galatians. Paul opens the letter by briefly procaiming the gospel in 1:3-5, which is the true gospel. Yet, in Chapter 1, the word "gospel" appears five times all within the first 11 verses:

  1. 1:6 "a different gospel"
  2. 1:7 "distort the gospel of Christ"
  3. 1:8 "a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you"
  4. 1:9 "gospel contrary to what you received"
  5. 1:11 "gospel which was preached by me is not according to man"

In the first four appearances of the word "gospel" it is in the context of being contrary or perverted to the true gospel (1:3-5). Further, Paul clearly points out that the false gospel is from man (1:7, 9) as opposed to being from God and says twice in successive verses that any man who preaches a gospel that is contrary to what he has preached should be accursed! This is really important when we see something repeated two times like this.

Paul then poses the rhetorical question which may seem a little oddly placed. He says in 1:10-

10For am I now seeking the favor of men, or of God? Or am I striving to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a bond-servant of Christ.

Paul was talking about the true gospel being from God versus the false gospel from man. Suddenly Paul is talking about seeking favor from God or men. Imagine that Paul is the messenger carrying the gospel. In modern times, perhaps this is a spokeperson, or in Washington D.C. this would be the White House Press Secretary who conveys the Administration's message to the press. The messenger's job is to deliver the message, but who is the judge of whether that message is delivered accurately and well? Who is the messenger trying to please? The sender makes all the difference- is the gospel of God or of man? Paul of course is preaching the true gospel which is from God, hence he is seeking the favor of God and not of man.

This is a very important point for all of us to heed, for we all carry the gospel message wherever we go. And I hope you are praying for oppourtunities to preach the gospel wherever you are. We must remember that we are seeking to please God as we carry forth His message, and not men. "Men" could our parents, our pastor, our Christian friends, our manager at work- it could be anyone other than God! The gospel is not of man, but of God, so let us please the true Sender.

In 1:11 does Paul finally refer to the true gospel is "not according to man," "received it from man," "nor taught it" and then proceeds to explain that it is from God (1:12). Note how Paul talks about the gospel. We(man) do not give the gospel, nor teach it, but others received the gospel by revelation by Jesus Christ Himself!

Following, Paul recounts-
  1. His life before Christ as a persecutor of Christians (1:13-14).
    • "My former manner of life" 1:13
    • Note the "I" pronoun.
  2. How he became a Christian by God's calling through grace and by the revelation of Christ (1:15-16)
    • Subject is God, not "I" - God is the active participant in a person's salvation.
    • Pronoun is now "me"
  3. His life after becoming a Christian: preaching the faith (1:16b-23)
    • "I" pronoun again.
    • Parenthetical statement ("Now in what I am writing to you, I assure you before God that I am not lying") likening to 1:1.
  4. What it means to be a Christian (1:23-24)
    • "They" pronoun
    • Others would glorify God because of you!

In short, Paul is giving his testimony!

Note that Paul says that he was called to the Lord "through His grace." (1:15) Grace is receiving things you do not deserve. Grace is central to the salvation of Christ. "Not by works so that no one can boast." Notice that when Paul talks about his personal salvation story, the focus is not what he did to be saved, rather the focus is on what God did. In verses 1:15-16, God is the subject and the verb clauses are "set (me apart)", "called (me)", "was pleased to reveal." God is setting us apart (another way to say being made holy), calling us to Him through His grace and not by our works, and revealing His Son in us so that we might do what God's called us to do. For Paul that would be to preach Him among the Gentiles. Paul could have phrased it differently, but he says "to preach Him." (1:16) Very interesting. This kinda of recalls John 1, where the Word refers to Jesus. So Paul is to preach Jesus, the Word!

In 1:16-24, Paul recounts his early days as a Christian and makes a point to say that he was nor influenced by man-

1:16 "I did not immediately consult with flesh and blood"
1:17 "nor did I got to Jerusalem to whose who were apostles before me; but I went away to Arabia, and returned once more to Damascus(Acts 9:2?)"
1:18 "The three years later I went up to Jerusalem to become acquainted with Cephas, and stayed with him fifteen days.
1:19 "But I did not see any other of the apostles except James..."
1:21 "Then I went into the regions of Syria(Acts 15:23, 41) and Cilicia(Acts 6:9?)"
1:22 "I was still unknown by sight tot he churches of Judea which were in Christ"

Paul seems to be saying that he spent very little time with other Christians in his early days and even when he did they were apostles(Cephas) or an early church leader (James). This isn't revisionist history by Paul either. Looking back in the book of Acts, after Saul's conversion in Acts 9, Luke writes very little about Saul. Is whisked away from Jerusalem for the Hellenistic Jews there were seeking to kill him. We don't hear anything of him until Acts 11, when Barnabas brings him back from Tarsus to help with the church in Antioch.

I belive Paul is making a point of this "gospel of God vs. Man" thing because this establishes the foundation for the rest of this letter. And so he must establish that he is sent from God as an apostle and not sent by man.

Remember the innocuous salutation at the beginning of the chapter? In 1:3-

3Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ,
4who gave Himself for our sins so that He might rescue us from this present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father,
5to whom be the glory forevermore. Amen.

Paul is in fact greeting the Galatians with the whole point of his letter. The thesis is to live by the true gospel of Jesus Christ, a gospel of grace, liberty and freedom, which is from God, as opposed to living a gospel from man which is of the flesh, bondage and the Law.


Friday, March 07, 2008

Between the Lines

Sometimes you just gotta read inter linear. What a cliche'!

Discovered this cool site for Old and New Testament Interlinears: http://www.scripture4all.org/

There's also a downloadable version to install on your computer: http://www.scripture4all.org/download/download_ISA20.php

Interlinears are a great Bible study tool, even if you don't know Hebrew or Koine Greek. It's helpful to just look up the the words in a Bible Dictionary or Lexicon.

I use The Interlinear NASB-NIV Parallel New Testament in Greek and English. Don't have an Old Testament one yet.

How do you interpret the Bible?

Stumbled upon a pretty interesting Hermeneutics Quiz.

Click here to take the quiz: http://buildingchurchleaders.com/assessments/individuals/hermeneuticsquiz.html

Which of the three categories do you fall into? Agree? Disagree? What do you think?

I scored a 32.

Perhaps the title of this entry should be, "Why do you interpret the Bible the way you do?"

Saturday, July 28, 2007

The Value of Human Life

What strange times we live in.

I noticed the cover story of the August 6, 2007 issue of BusinessWeek: "The Pet Economy." Under the title it reads, "Americans now spend $41 BILLION on their pets." That is "more than the gross domestic product of all but 64 countries in the world" it continues at the beginning of the article (page 45, 2nd paragraph). I haven't read the entire story- maybe I will later... but...

Holy Cow! Literally.

Ironically, also in the news and media this week is Michael Vick, the starting quarterback of the NFL Atlanta Falcons, who got mixed up in a dogfighting ring which was on his own property. Listening to AM680 today, Razor was ranting about how Vick would not play in the NFL next year and probably for a long while. He was saying how Americans have a soft spot for pets and they will not be able to look past (forgive) this, hence no NFL team would sign him; assuming the Falcons are rid of him. If you follow sports, you know that if the athlete can perform some team is going to sign him; no matter what he did.

Laurence Phillips, who beat up a girl in college, was drafted by the Rams and even played for the 49ers! What about Kobe Bryant, a confessed adulterer? It appears the media's forgotten all about it, though maybe his endorsement deals aren't what they once were.

Trust me Razor, if Michael Vick can perform he'll be back in some capacity.


Seeing these two stories in the media really got me thinking about the value of human life and man's place in the world. It seems our society affords more value and dignity to an animal than to a human being.

A pastor visiting our church noted the one thing that really struck him about The City after moving here was the sheer amount of people begging on the streets. His wife came up w/ the novel idea of always keeping McDonald's gift certificates in her purse to give out rather than giving cash which could go to cigarettes, alcohol, or drugs.

$41,000,000,000 each year, and growing, would go a long way in helping the homeless. Heck, I wonder if that could provide housing, food, rehab and job training to every single homeless person in the nation each year?


So what is man? Naturally, the answer comes from God, the Creator.

Genesis 1:26-28

26Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth."

27God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

28God blessed them; and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth."


Psalm 8
1O LORD, our Lord,
How majestic is Your name in all the earth,
Who have displayed Your splendor above the heavens!
2From the mouth of infants and nursing babes You have established strength
Because of Your adversaries,
To make the enemy and the revengeful cease.
3When I consider Your heavens, the work of Your fingers,
The moon and the stars, which You have ordained;
4What is man that You take thought of him,
And the son of man that You care for him?
5Yet You have made him a little lower than God,
And You crown him with glory and majesty!
6You make him to rule over the works of Your hands;
You have put all things under his feet,
7All sheep and oxen,
And also the beasts of the field,
8The birds of the heavens and the fish of the sea,
Whatever passes through the paths of the seas.
9O LORD, our Lord,
How majestic is Your name in all the earth!

FYI: I've never been a "pet person." I'm fine around them but I've never wanted pets- dogs, cats, birds, hamsters, fish, you name it- just wasn't not for me. I have enough things to take care of as it is. Nothing wrong with having pets though.

What Vick did was wrong, but what's worse, the abuse of animals or the abuse of a fellow human being?

Saturday, July 14, 2007

Why did God Make the Israelites His Chosen People?

Deuteronomy 7:6-11

6"For you are a holy people to the LORD your God; the LORD your God has chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth.

7"The LORD did not set His love on you nor choose you because you were more in number than any of the peoples, for you were the fewest of all peoples,

8but because the LORD loved you and kept the oath which He swore to your forefathers, the LORD brought you out by a mighty hand and redeemed you from the house of slavery, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.

9"Know therefore that the LORD your God, He is God, the faithful God, who keeps His covenant and His lovingkindness to a thousandth generation with those who love Him and keep His commandments;

10but repays those who hate Him to their faces, to destroy them; He will not delay with him who hates Him, He will repay him to his face.

11"Therefore, you shall keep the commandment and the statutes and the judgments which I am commanding you today, to do them.

Cross-reference Genesis 12.

Thursday, July 05, 2007

Thy Kingdom Come (Luke 1)

The Gospel According to Luke opens w/ the purpose of the book, addressing its intended audience. I've previously written about it here on my personal blog:

http://wilsonleungsworld.blogspot.com/2007/04/according-to-luke.html


Reading Luke 1, I was struck by the incredible parallelism between Zechariah and Mary's separate encounters with the Archangel Gabriel.


Compare Zechariah and Mary’s Encounter w/ Gabriel

What

Zechariah

Mary

Comment

Z. = Zechariah

M. = Mary

Angel Appears

10And an angel of the Lord appeared to him, standing to the right of the altar of incense.

28"Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you."

Gabriel doesn’t say anything to Z., but does to M. when he 1st appears.

Reaction

12Zacharias was troubled when he saw the angel, and fear gripped him.

29But she was very perplexed at this statement, and kept pondering what kind of salutation this was.

Likewise, Z. is troubled by the angel’s appearance, whereas M. is perplexed at what he said.

Angel says

13Do not be afraid, Zacharias, for your petition has been heard, and your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you will give him the name John.

"You will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth.

15"For he will be great in the sight of the Lord; and he will drink no wine or liquor, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit while yet in his mother's womb.

16"And he will turn many of the sons of Israel back to the Lord their God.

17"It is he who will go as a forerunner before Him in the spirit and power of Elijah,TO TURN THE HEARTS OF THE FATHERS BACK TO THE CHILDREN, and the disobedient to the attitude of the righteous, so as to make ready a people prepared for the Lord."

30"Do not be afraid, Mary; for you have found favor with God.

31"And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall name Him Jesus.

32"He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David;

33and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and His kingdom will have no end."

Z. and M. both get “Do not be afraid.”

God hears and answers Z’s petition, whereas M. did not petition anything, yet God found favor in her.

Gabriel proceeds to foretell the lives of John and Jesus.

Response

18"How will I know this for certain? For I am an old man and my wife is advanced in years."

34"How can this be, since I am a virgin?"

In v18, “for certain,” is not in the Greek, but added for clarity.

Z. asks how he will know it will be true, whereas M. asks how it will happen. Fine distinction, but it is supported in Gabriel’s response…

Angel says

19"I am Gabriel, who stands in the presence of God, and I have been sent to speak to you and to bring you this good news.

20"And behold, you shall be silent and unable to speak until the day when these things take place, because you did not believe my words, which will be fulfilled in their proper time."

The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy Child shall be called the Son of God.

36"And behold, even your relative Elizabeth has also conceived a son in her old age; and she who was called barren is now in her sixth month.

37"For nothing will be impossible with God."

Let me try to paraphrase the Gabriel’s response to Z. and to M.:

To Z.: You will know this for certain b/c I am archangel of God and have been sent by God. (He appeals to the authority of the master.)

To M.: Gabriel answers by explaining how it will come to be since that is what Mary asked!

Pretty simple!

Response

Elizabeth

25"This is the way the Lord has dealt with me in the days when He looked with favor upon me, to take away my disgrace among men."

38"Behold, the bondslave of the Lord; may it be done to me according to your word."

Interestingly, Z. doesn’t get to reflect on what has occurred; at least it is not recorded by Luke. So, as Z. was muted due to doubt, he’s also muted in the Scriptural record. Rather, Elizabeth reflects on God’s blessing, not Z.

M.’s response is of such beautiful total submission to God. And, the final clause, “may it be done to me according to your word” – really shows that she never doubted Gabriel’s word!



In the Old Testament, Abraham/Sarah, Isaac/Rebekah, and Jacob/Rachel were not able to have children until the Lord allowed it. As Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were the beginning of the original covenant to form the Israelite nation - a physical kingdom, so John (the forerunner) and Jesus (the King) is the beginning of the new covenant to begin the spiritual kingdom of God. This "new beginning," so to speak, starts are off in similar yet different fashion. Zechariah and Elizabeth, who are advanced in age, are not able to have children until God allows it per the Holy Spirit; echoing the travails of the patriarchs.

Then the pattern changes! Before, God gave child(ren) to couples who were previously unable to have children. Now, He gives a child to a couple that is not even yet married, though betrothed, and the woman has not even "known" a man. Yet again, it is achieved by the Holy Spirit. Whereas the former O.T. couples and Zech./Elizabeth petitioned God to have children, Mary and Joseph in no way asked for a child before marriage. In fact much has been made of the fact that Joseph, and Mary too, were likely to be seen in disgrace by common folk in that she was pregnant before marriage! (Boy, what an age and society we live now. How far we strayed!)

And so, God ushers in His kingdom on Earth by breaking the pattern w/ the birth of His son.

Putting myself in that time, in that place, in their shoes... reflecting on what I knew about the patriarchs, I hope I would have surmised that the birth of this baby Jesus was something the Israelites, and the world, has never seen and will never seen again- The virgin birth- of the Messiah no less.

I'm amazed by Mary's attitude. Romans, Galatians, Philippians, Titus, Jude, James, 2 Peter, and Revelation open w/ the writer referring to himself as a bond-servant of Jesus Christ. But it was Mary, the mother of the Jesus, who is the 1st in the N.T. to choose to be eternally bonded as servant to her own son, the Son of God. Luke 1:38 is the key application verse: "Behold, the bondslave of the Lord; may it be done to me according to your word."






Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Filled with the Holy Spirit

This past Sunday, our church had a farewell party for DF and family. I had the honor of sharing a few words on be-half of the church. Just the day before, I got to spend precious time w/ Swan and his family! As I began writing the farewell to DF Saturday evening, it occurred to me to use the concepts learned from "How to Study the Bible" sessions: Observations/Context/Content/Conversation. As well, in the Hebrew Scriptures we saw many examples of chiastic structure, so I threw that in as well.

I opened with some observations, but then got to the chiastic part. Here's my outline of that section:

A = Blessed to have a wonderful founding pastor in Sonny.

B = Sonny concluded his ministry at Hope in 2005.
C = Anytime a pastor moves on it is hard on the ministry, and even harder at a personal level.
D = Loved Pastor Sonny and his family.
E = How could we find a pastor and his family that we’d love just as much?
F = 2005 outlook was rotating guest speakers- not ideal for the teaching ministry.
G = End of 2005, the Lord brought the answer: guy w/ a weird name with his loving wife, and amazing children.
F' = 2006/2007 outlook- 3x/month consistency through books of the OT, then the NT.
E' = How did we find a pastor and his family whom we love so very much?
D' = Love Dorman and his family.
C' = What joy to find our pastor, but, now, it is hard to part ways as God is re-directing.
B' = Dorman concludes his ministry this year, 2007. But it goes on…
A' = Blessed to have Dorman be our pastor.

As I reviewed my outline, it struck me how hard it is to remember where I am in the structure when actually speaking without glancing at my notes!
My central point is that it is the Lord that brings the pastor to His church.

Then I re-called the first sermon delivered by the apostle Peter in the book of Acts, Acts 2:14-36, which DF outlined* for us in his sermon. Peter's sermon is a 10 point chiastic w/ the tenth ('J') point repeated:

J = that He(Jesus) was not abandoned to Hades.
J' = nor did His flesh see corruption

So the main point of Peter's sermon is that Jesus' death on the cross was not final, but that he resurrected!

In my head, I knew Peter was filled with the Spirit but now I know it in my heart. Just a week before, Peter cowered in fear. Now, he not only spoke boldly, but spoke in an incredibly structured way to highlight the central point, and the sermon was on-the-fly: he had no notes, and no preparation! I wonder if it even occurred to Peter at that moment that his sermon was in chiastic form. Filled with the Holy Spirit, indeed!

References:
* Outline of Acts 2:14-36 is from Poet & Peasant and Through Peasant Eyes pg 65,66. Dr. Kenneth Bailey.

Monday, April 16, 2007

According to Luke

Luke 1 (NASB)

1Inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile an account of the things accomplished among us,

  1. Others have written other gospel accounts (Matthew, Mark)
  2. “accomplished among us” – not “we accomplished”

2just as they were handed down to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the word,

  1. Other gospel accounts were distributed among the believers
  2. Accounts were by eyewitnesses. (Matthew was a disciple/eye witness)
  3. “from the beginning” – Matthew was at the beginning of the Jesus’ ministry, Mark was at the beginning of the church (Acts)
  4. Writers were servants of the word – appropriate for them to write an account.
    • the_luck_duck deftly noted "word" could be "Word" a la John 1:1. Greek word here is "logos" as in John.

3it seemed fitting for me as well, having investigated everything carefully from the beginning, to write it out for you in consecutive order, most excellent Theophilus;

  1. Luke was not an eyewitness but a historian, or “investigative reporter”
  2. Though not an eyewitness, Luke investigated from the beginning. (2nd mention of “from the beginning")
  3. Written account, not an oral tradition
  4. Account is organized chronologically
    • Greek: "orderly", so may not necessarily be chronological
  5. Who is Theophilus? Real person? General term?
  6. Name is Greek: “God Lover”, He was Gentile.
  7. “Most excellent” – maybe he was an official?

4so that you may know the exact truth about the things you have been taught.

  1. Luke’s purpose for writing: “may know the truth”
  2. “taught” – Theophilus wasn’t an eyewitness either, likely didn’t know Jesus.
Conclusion: The Gospel According to Luke is written so that the non-eyewitnesses, the Gentile “God Lover” in particular (that's me!), may know that the things they believe are true.

 

© New Blogger Templates | Webtalks